Cetirizine-induced psychosis in a young adult with erythema multiforme

  1. David Croitoru 1 , 2,
  2. Stephanie G Brooks 1,
  3. Vincent Piguet 2 , 3 and
  4. Lindsey MacGillivray 4 , 5
  1. 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3 Department of Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5 Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr David Croitoru; david.croitoru@utoronto.ca

Publication history

Accepted:27 Jan 2021
First published:05 Feb 2021
Online issue publication:05 Feb 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

We describe a case of a young man, taking no other routine medications, presenting with erythema multiforme and cetirizine-induced psychosis with re-challenge evidence. On retrospective elicitation of history, it was found that he had been involved in a motor vehicle collision 4 months prior and was a daily cannabis user; there were no objective abnormalities by MRI and neurological evaluations. Although rare, cetirizine-induced psychosis is an important adverse drug reaction that warrants the attention of healthcare practitioners.

Background

Cetirizine is a second-generation H1-inverse agonist selective for peripheral H1 receptors, primarily used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.1 2 Off-label, it is commonly used for a number of pruritic dermatological conditions as part of treatment and symptom management. Unlike first-generation antihistamines, second-generations have minimal anticholinergic activity; however, psychomotor impairment and central nervous system (CNS) effects have been described, including somnolence and paradoxical excitability.1–3 There have been multiple cases of first-generation antihistamine-induced psychosis with promethazine and other first-generation antihistamines in young and healthy populations.4–6

Case presentation

A man in his late 20s with no psychiatric history was brought by his mother to the emergency department in September 2020 due to two discrete episodes of unusual aggressive behaviour, agitation, paranoia, short-term memory loss and auditory and visual hallucinations, which began in the context of new cetirizine use for a pruritic cutaneous eruption. He presented to his family physician 2 weeks after onset of rash and was prescribed 20 mg cetirizine one time per day. He took cetirizine for 2 days before the onset of visual and auditory hallucinations of family members and paranoid delusions about an unidentified ‘family’ in his backyard targeting him. No other routine medications were taken. These symptoms resolved with cetirizine cessation; however, given the persistence of his rash and pruritus, he took a third dose on day 5, resulting in acute recurrence of his psychotic symptoms and aggressive behaviour. He was admitted to psychiatry for diagnostic clarification and stabilisation. He had a past medical history of treated primary syphilis and recurrent herpes simplex labialis. On review of systems by collateral and retrospectively since discharge, he had suffered from self-limited coryza, pharyngitis and subjective fever (chills, rigours), as well as a herpetic lesion in the week prior to the onset of rash, but no other systemic symptoms. He also retrospectively reported involvment in a motor vehicle collison (MVC) 4 months prior that led to physical injuries (brachial plexopathy) and has been experiencing depressive symptoms ever since.

On mental status examination, the patient appeared disorganised in thought process, responding non-linearly to questions and endorsing paranoia and persecutory delusions about his family members. He reported visual hallucinations of an unidentified ‘family’ targeting him at home. He appeared to be responding to internal stimuli and was observed to be running out of his room on multiple occasions, as if trying to avoid a presence in his room.

Dermatological examination revealed resolving red-purple papules and nodules distributed on the anterior and posterior trunk, as well as the proximal extremities, with greater upper than lower limb involvement. Many of these were flattening and non-tender on palpation. The palms and soles were spared. Mucosal erosions were noted on the anterior lower labial and gingival mucosa (figure 1).

Figure 1

Cutaneous eruption and external labial mucosal ulceration compatible with erythema multiforme. The eruption of erythematous, dusky and pruritic papulonodules began on the patient’s dorsal and volar acral arms followed by trunk (A,B) and lower extremity involvement within 24–48 hours. Oral mucosal ulcerations (C) were noted on the external labial and gingival mucosae.

Investigations

Laboratory investigations demonstrated a slight lymphopenia (0.8), mild aminitis (AST (aspartate aminotransferase) 102.0 U/L, ALT (alanine aminotransferase) 61.0 U/L, ALP (alkaline phosphatase) 79.0 U/L; bilirubin normal) and elevated ferritin (1931.0 ug/L); syphilis serologies were negative. Toxicology was positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) only. MRI with contrast showed no acute or chronic abnormalities. A cutaneous biopsy of a papulonodule demonstrated focal interface change, superficial and deep dermal perivascular and interstitial lymphoeosinophilic infiltrates with no evidence of vasculitis, compatible with resolving erythema multiforme. Swabs of the oral mucosal erosions were negative for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus by PCR.

Differential diagnosis

The possibility of cannabis-induced psychosis was entertained, however the patient had never experienced similar recations to other antihistamine medications with or without cannabis usage, which he had been smoking roughly 0.9 g per day for several years without dose or source change. A major depressive episode with psychotic features was also entertained as a diagnostic possibility, but was deemed less likely given the acute onset, cetirizine re-challenge evidence and rapid resolution of psychotic symptoms with only low doses of pharmacotherapy.

The differential diagnosis of the cutaneous eruption, given the histology, includes a fixed-drug eruption and arthropod bites, however the clinical scenario including mucosal ulceration, histopathological interface change and prior viral infectious process largely favours erythema multiforme.

Treatment

To manage his depression and acute psychotic symptoms, the patient was started on sertraline 50 mg and aripiprazole 5 mg one time per day, respectively. His pruritic eruption was managed with topical 0.05% betamethasone valerate cream two times per day as needed to affected areas for itch.

Outcome and follow-up

Over the course of the 5-day admission, he was compliant with treatment and his hallucinations and paranoid delusions resolved entirely. He quickly gained insight into his psychotic symptoms and described being aware of experiencing ‘hallucinations’ on both occasions shortly after taking cetirizine. He was advised to continue his antipsychotic and antidepressant medications for at least 6 months and avoid cetirizine indefinitely. He was also counselled on the risk of ongoing cannabis use in precipitating psychosis. His mother had visited him on the unit and indicated that he had returned to his baseline and had no safety concerns. Eight-weeks post discharge, the patient continued to deny any psychotic symptoms despite resumption of cannabis use and the mucocutaneous eruption had resolved.

Discussion

While blood-brain barrier penetrance is limited among the second-generations,1 there have been at least two reports of psychosis and delusions with cetirizine use in an 18-year-old woman7 and a 56-year-old man.8 Both patients were otherwise healthy and their symptoms completely resolved with cetirizine cessation.7 8 However, unlike in our case, which also had potentiating risk factors of cannabis use and recent head trauma, there was no report of predisposing risk factors for psychosis in either of these patients.

Erythema multiforme is a relatively common hypersensitivity reaction to viral infections, most commonly HSV, but also pox-family viruses, adenoviruses, vaccines and other infections, including mycoplasma and dermatophytosis.9 The typical eruption appears targetoid; however, it has many forms, predominantly involving acral sites, the upper extremities and mucous membranes without systemic manifestations. The majority of cases are self-limited within several weeks and do not involve treatment. While our case lacked the typical targetoid appearance and palmar involvement, the distribution and clinical presentation was otherwise most compatible with erythema multiforme.

As the cutaneous diagnosis only indirectly contributed to hospital admission, the drastic adverse reaction our patient had to a ubiquitously prescribed second-generation antihistamine was of particular interest in this case. We would like to use this case as an opportunity to highlight the CNS effects of all medications in this class. While our patient had predisposing risk factors for his acute mental status change, such as a preceding injury and possible post-concussive syndrome, as well as daily cannabis use, these are relatively common exposures. As such, prescribers should be aware of this rare possible adverse event in populations vulnerable for delirium and psychosis. In terms of cetirizine’s properties, compared with loratadine, it is associated with lower psychomotor impairment; however, it does show the most sedating subjective psychometric scores.10 While cetirizine-induced psychosis is rare, we highlight a case with re-challenge evidence in a young man with no formal past psychiatric history, risk factors of routine cannabis use and a recent MVC with post-concussive and depressive symptoms, but no evidence of brain trauma.

Patient’s perspective

The first day I took the medicine, the hallucinations were mild and I had close family around, so looking back, I didn't think much of it because it meshed with reality so well that I took it for what it was: my brother, sister and mother ‘teleported’ into my room without opening the door to ask me some ridiculous question.

The next time I took the medication things got immensely worse. It did treat my skin itch which is initially why I was prescribed it. But to this day I have never been so scared for my life. I was alone at home and for some reason my mind conjured a group of people in my room trying to do anything to bring me harm.

Learning points

  • Although second-generation antihistamines have minimal anticholnergic activity compared with first-generations, they may cause central nervous system effects, including psychosis.

  • Cetirizine-induced psychosis is a rare yet important adverse drug reaction to be aware of, particularly in patients who have other risk factors for psychosis.

  • The efficacy of low-dose pharmacotherapy and speed of resolution with drug discontinuation can help distinguish drug-induced causes of psychosis from other aetiologies.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Clinical evaluation: DC, LM. Drafting: DC, SB. Revisions: LM, VP, DC.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer